Week 9: International Aid & Development
By: Alison Hart, Sly Sarkisova, Scott Wisner & Dana Young
Article: *UPDATE*
Much of the relief money bypasses the government, so no one is responsible for focusing efforts.
By JONATHAN M. KATZ The Associated Press
Also, new article about the Red Cross:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2010/03/17/mtl-red-cross-tsunami-enquete.html
Summary of Discussion from World Cafe
- No government registration or regulation currently of NGO’s operating in Haiti. Was to happen in previous years under Bill Clinton’s work as envoy to Haiti but has not occurred. Only 1% of the billions of dollars in aid that has been sent to Haiti has gone through the Haitian government. Discussion of the difficulties involved in building up and strengthening the Haitian government when they have no idea of the work being done in their country.
- Discussion of the dangers of donating money/resources to a cause out of a motivation to ease your own conscience and allow yourself to disconnect from what is going on and why because you have ‘done your part’
- Desire to have donations of money/resources go directly to the people and not through a gov’t, NGO, or corporate body. How can this happen? Possibly through individual’s direct connections to people in Haiti?…
- Discussion of the current push for Haiti’s rebuilding economy to focus on garment industry in ‘free trade’ zones and tourism business. Both of which generally create low paying insecure jobs with little benefits that create little tax revenue for the country
- Need to CANCEL Haiti’s debt!
- Perhaps aid dollars better spent on lobby to France and U.S. to pay reparations to Haiti for past injustices done?
- Discussion of temporarily relocating Haitians. Fear of not being able to return to their communities – parallels drawn with the victims of Hurricane Katrina who left their homes for a reconstruction that never really occurred. Also, concerns that Haitians will be left out of the work that will need to be done to construct infrastructure. Parallels drawn to the reconstruction of Iraq done by American firms using foreign (not Iraqi) labour.
- Discussion of Colin Powel’s statements regarding offering aid to ensure the destitute do not become the dangerous. Discussion of different groups (e.g. American Government, Al Qaeda) vying for the support of people in need through the donation of resources – some groups are labelled terrorists and some aren’t but is the only difference their means of oppression?
***
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CB_HAITI_EARTHQUAKE?SITE=FLSTU&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Questions
1) In Ananya Roy’s article, To What End?, we read of used clothing being sent to tsunami victims who are too proud to wear them. Devinder Sharmal speaks of subsidized rice being sent to the people of India in need which is ruining their agricultural trade. And in the article presented by our group for consideration, the Haitian Prime Minister, Jean-Max Bellerive, criticizes the aid money ‘pouring’ into the country but bypassing the Haitian government.
In ‘Handing it to Haiti’, Naomi Klein emphasizes the need for Haitians to no longer be passive recipients of aid but to reframe the discourse as one of reparations owed. Prior to getting to that point, however, Haitians will need to be ‘FORGIVEN’ the debt owed to the system that helped to create and sustain it.
As Social Workers, parallels to these points can be drawn all the way down to our work at the individual level. How open are we to individuals, groups, countries, and so on. moving past the identity of the passive recipient of the help we are able or willing to give, to demanding that needs be met and inequities be addressed from a human rights and social justice standpoint? And relatedly, just how far are we comfortable with people empowering themselves?
2) In the wake of the Jan. 12th earthquake in Haiti, the US has suggested that the best way to get Haitians involved in rebuilding their country is to continue to focus on their apparel industry. Currently, there is a push to extend an important tariff free trade deal with the US to expand Haiti’s export market. Davinder Sharma notes that trading in food has resulted in the increasing consumption and commodification of developing nations’ agricultural land, increasing the dependency on food charity for 1/3rd of the world’s impoverished population. In the same vein, how might emphasizing Haiti’s apparel industry, where workers are paid less than $2 per day, aid in the recovery of Haiti’s economy? Is this possible? What are the implications?
3) Ananya Roy states that “today, they are recast as the destitute, the deserving destitutes. But we care because these destitutes might turn desperate. They might threaten, as Colin Powell has noted, our security. They could, if left unaided, turn into terrorists. In our article it is highlighted that “USAID paid at least $160 million of its total Haiti-related expenditures to the Defense Department, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, two local U.S. search and rescue teams…” How can attention be drawn to this, and would this lead to questioning of why Haitians are being portrayed as in need of management?
References
Devinder Sharmal, interviewed by Anjali Kamat & Amy Goodman. (October, 14, 2009). As US and other wealthy nations slash aid, UN warns of “Silent Tsunami of Hunger” in global food crisis. Democracy NOW! http://www.democracynow.org/2009/10/14/as_us_and_other_wealthy_nations
Roy, Ananya (2005). To what end? Politics and Culture. (2). http://aspen.conncoll.edu/politicsandculture/page.cfm?key=378
Rai, Shirin M. (2002). Global restructuring and restructuring gender relations: The politics of structural adjustment. In Gender and the Political Economy of Development: From nationalism to globalization. Polity Press: Cambridge, 121-158.
Manful, Saka E. & Manful, Esmeranda. (2010). Improving the lives of Ghanaian children: complementing the global agenda with a structural social work approach International Journal of Social Welfare, 19 (1), 115-123.